United States v. Anthony Salerno Appeal of William Silverman
UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony SALERNO Et Al. Appeal of William SILVERMAN
Opinion
PER CURIAM SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING The decision of the court in this case is predicated largely upon the explicit statement, quoted at page 1008 of the panel’s opinion, 538 F.2d 1005 , made by the sentencing judge at the time he imposed sentence and it is his statement which makes this case unique. Our holding is narrow and does not vest sentencing courts, as alleged by the petitioner, “with power of a super parole board.” Our decision does, however, “permit the district court to correct a sentencing error where the import of the judge’s sentence has in fact been changed by guidelines adopted by the Parole Board . . . subsequent to the imposition of that sentence.”
United States v. White, 540 F.2d 409, at 411 (8th Cir., 1976).
The petition for rehearing, insofar as it may be presumed under our procedures to also request panel rehearing, will be denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(a former § 4208(a)(2) sentence)
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.