TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Krueger v. Nobles

G. P. Krueger, Et Al., v. O. Nobles, as Receiver

Krueger v. Nobles, 149 So. 801 (Fla. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 21, 1933
Judges
Davis, Whitfield, Buford
Citations
149 So. 801112 Fla. 7

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed. Grand Lodge K. of P. v. Stroud, 107 Fla. 152 , 144 So. 324 ; Roberts Bros. v. Langford, 99 Fla. 1268 ; 128 So. 810 ; Bailey v. Newman, 107 Fla. 194 , 144 So. 392 .

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Stroud, 144 So. 324 (Fla. 1932) 12
Bailey v. Newman, 144 So. 392 (Fla. 1932) 1
Roberts Bros. v. Langford, 128 So. 810 (Fla. 1930) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list