TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blount Brothers Realty Co. v. Eilenberger

Blount Brothers Realty Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. D. Eilenberger, Defendant in Error

Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger, 124 So. 284 (Fla. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 3, 1930
Judges
Whitfield, Strum, Buford, Terrell, Ellis, Brown
Citations
124 So. 28498 Fla. 779

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, having suggested by petition for re-hearing that leave be given him to enter a remittitur in the sum of One Thousand Dollars, being the sum allowed for attorney’s fees; and it appearing to the Court that there is no error in the judgment of the court below other than in the allowance of said sum as attorney’s fees as pointed out in Blount Brothers Realty Company v. Eilenberger, 124 So. R. 41;

It is upon consideration of said petition for re-hearing ordered that if the defendant in error, plaintiff below, *780 within ten days from the date upon which the mandate of this Court is filed in the trial court, shall enter a remittitur in the sum of One Thousand Dollars as of the date of the rendition of said judgment in the trial court, to-wit: February 23, 1928, the remainder of said judgment in amount of $14,805.94, with the costs assessed therein in the sum of $29.41, shall stand affirmed with interest at the legal rate from the date of the entry of said judgment, to-wit, February 23, 1928. It is further ordered that all costs upon this writ of error be paid by defendant in error, plaintiff below.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the order.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1930: 31931: 11932: 11989: 119302026peak 1930 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mullan v. Bk. of Pasco Co.133 So. 323 (Fla. 1931)
  2. Millard v. Brannan553 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  3. Berns v. Harrison131 So. 654 (Fla. 1930)
  4. Hatch v. Trabue128 So. 420 (Fla. 1930)
  5. Indian Lumber Co. v. Roux143 So. 142 (Fla. 1932)
  6. Reid v. Merrell130 So. 713 (Fla. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Millard v. Brannan553 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  2. Indian Lumber Co. v. Roux143 So. 142 (Fla. 1932)
  3. Mullan v. Bk. of Pasco Co.133 So. 323 (Fla. 1931)
  4. Berns v. Harrison131 So. 654 (Fla. 1930)
  5. Reid v. Merrell130 So. 713 (Fla. 1930)
  6. Hatch v. Trabue128 So. 420 (Fla. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list