TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Borden's Dairy v. Zanders

Borden's Dairy v. Zanders, 42 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1949)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 1, 1949
Judges
CHAPMAN, Justice.
Citations
42 So. 2d 5391949 Fla. LEXIS 1006

Opinion of the Court

This is a Workmen's Compensation case. The record discloses that the claimant dropped a large can on the big toe at the time he was employed by Borden's Dairy. The injury grew progressively worse and some 60 or 90 days thereafter it became necessary to amputate his leg. It is conceded that when the claimant was injured he had a pre-existing disease, to-wit, diabetes. The injury to the toe, as shown by the record, simply aggravated the pre-existing disease and resulted in the removal of complainant's leg. In the case of Davis v. Artley Construction Co., 154 Fla. 481 , 18 So.2d 255 , we held that an injury received in the regular course of employment which materially aggravated or accelerated a pre-existing condition, resulting in the disability or death earlier than would otherwise occur, and the disability or death does not result from the disease alone, then an award may be made under our Compensation Act.

It is next contended that the claimant failed to give his employer notice of the injury sustained, as prescribed by Section *Page 540 440.18, F.S.A. The claimant failed, as shown by the record, to give the written statutory notice within the thirty day period after sustaining the injury, but testimony found on pages 34, 35 and 36 of the transcript reflects that a report of the injury was brought to the attention of claimant's superiors then in charge of operating the dairy. It was the view of the lower court, after a consideration of all the testimony, that the provisions of Section 440.18 had been substantially complied with. We hardly feel justified in disturbing the conclusions reached by the lower court. The burden of showing reversible error in the record rested on the appellant. Error has not been established.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11963: 11964: 11965: 11967: 21980: 119542026peak 1967 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission196 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1967)
  2. Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.201 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1967)
  3. Padrick Chevrolet Company v. Crosby75 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1954)
  4. Doric Food Co. v. Allen383 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
  5. Cameron v. City of Miami Beach152 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1963)
  6. Drew v. Wellman-Lord Engineering, Inc.166 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Doric Food Co. v. Allen383 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
  2. Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.201 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1967)
  3. Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission196 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1967)
  4. Trembley v. Terrazzo Tile Contractors, Inc.190 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1965) · Dissent
  5. Drew v. Wellman-Lord Engineering, Inc.166 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 1964)
  6. Cameron v. City of Miami Beach152 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Davis v. Artley Constr. Co., 18 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 1944) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list