Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
A.L. Reinschmidt, D. J. Reinschmidt and J. L. Reinschmidt, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Pensacola Cooperage Company, Appellants, v. the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation, and L. G. Crosby, Appellees
Opinion of the Court
West, C. J.
To an amended bill of complaint seeking to enjoin defendants from -interrupting, or interfering with the use by complainants of certain railroad tracks from the main line of the defendant railroad company to the' factory of complainants or of obstructing such track, a demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed.
This appeal is from that order.
*335 Because of the somewhat complicated state of facts shown by the bill we shall not at this stage of the proceedings discuss the principles of law involved.
It is sufficient to say that under the allegations of the bill an equity for substantial relief may be shown by appropriate and sufficient evidence; therefore the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been overruled. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329 , 86 So. 208 ; Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498 , 86 So. 336 .
The order appealed from is reversed.
Reversed.
Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur, in the opinion, Brown, J., not participating.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.