Hoadley v. City of Tarpon Springs
Elmer L. Hoadley, Appellant, v. the City of Tarpon Springs, Et Al., Appellees
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This appeal is from a decree dismissing on demurrer a bill of complaint brought to test the validity of Chapter 14430, Acts of 1929, and'upon consideration the Court is of opinion that such act is in conflict with the provisions, limitations and intendments of Sections 1, 5 and 10 of Article IX, and Section 8, Article VIII, and Sections 16 and 24, Article III, of the Florida Constitution, in that the organic law requires that all property shall be taxed upon the principles established for State taxation; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed that the decree appealed from be and is hereby reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.