TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Grim v. Juvenal

State, Ex Rel. Charles H. Grim v. J. H. Juvenal, as Chairman, Et Al., as Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, Et Al.

State ex rel. Grim v. Juvenal, 159 So. 665 (Fla. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 25, 1935
Docket
No. A.
Judges
Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, Davis
Citations
159 So. 665118 Fla. 4851935 Fla. LEXIS 1742

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The command of the alternative writ is that the respondents, as members of the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County convene and approve the salary bill of relator, and do all things necessary to pay the compensation due relator as the duly commissioned and qualified Probation officer of Broward County, Florida, under Section 3690 C. G. L., 2325 R. G. S., for the period from June, 1933, to October, 1934, amounting to $1,275.00, and that the respondent, J. H. Juvenal, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, and the respondent, E. R. Bennett, as Clerk of said Board, draw and countersign a warrant or warrants to the relator in payment of his salary claim aforesaid. The command of the wxdt extends “to all subsequent bills for salary” and is addressed not only to the respondents, but to their successors in office as well.

To the extent that the command of the writ extends to “all subsequent bills for salary” and to the extent that it runs to the successors in office of respondents the writ is too broad and the motion to quash interposed thereto is well taken and should be sustained. State, ex rel.

Ben Hur Life Insurance Assn. v. Vickers, 115 Fla. 561 , 156 Sou. Rep. 19 .

It is therefore ordered that the alternative writ of mandamus herein be quashed with leave to amend in conformity *487 with this opinion within ten days, respondents to have a like period for further motion, answer or reply to the alternative writ as amended.

Alternative writ quashed with leave to amend.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 11936: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Ship Canal Authority v. Lancaster170 So. 126 (Fla. 1936)
  2. State ex rel. Crim v. Juvenal163 So. 569 (Fla. 1935)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Ship Canal Authority v. Lancaster170 So. 126 (Fla. 1936)
  2. State ex rel. Crim v. Juvenal163 So. 569 (Fla. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Pinellas Cnty. v. Sholtz, 155 So. 736 (Fla. 1934) 8
State ex rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'n v. Vickers, 156 So. 19 (Fla. 1934) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list