Parrish v. State
T. J. Parrish, Plaintiff in Error, vs. the State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Brown are of opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton vs. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 , 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the lower court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.