TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dukes v. State

Irving Dukes v. State of Florida

Dukes v. State, 3 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 5, 1941
Judges
Terrell, Whitfield, Chapman, Thomas, Brown
Citations
3 So. 2d 754148 Fla. 1091941 Fla. LEXIS 845

Opinion of the Court — Terrell

*110 Terrell, J.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in Walton County for withholding the means of support from his minor child. Sentence was withheld until the next regular term of court on condition that he contribute two dollars per week to the support of his child. Failing to appear at the next term of court, his appearance bond was estreated and he was taken into custody by the sheriff.

He moved to vacate the verdict and dismiss the prosecution on the ground that he was not a citizen of this State. His motion was denied and he was sentenced to serve one year at hard labor in the state penitentiary. This appeal is from the judgment so imposed.

Section 5496, Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 7654, Compiled General Laws of 1927, makes it a felony for a man “in this State” to withhold from •his wife or children the means of support. Appellant supports motion with an affidavit to the effect that he was never a citizen of this State but he does not say that he was not in the State at the time or that his child was not here. The punishment imposed does not depend on citizenship.

, Appellant did not testify at the trial to any of the allegations set up in his motion. Motions are not self supporting and will not be permitted to set aside a verdict and judgment secured in due course and no showing of fraud or double dealing is revealed.

The only other assault on the trial is directed to the validity of the order prescribing the conditions of the bond for support of the child but that question appears to have been raised for the first time in this court and will not be considered.

Affirmed.

*111 Whitfield, Acting C. J., Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concurring.

Brown, C. J., absent, not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11960: 11964: 11967: 11968: 11970: 11971: 11982: 11996: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Darnell230 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1970)
  2. Steinhorst v. State412 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1982)
  3. Mathis v. State682 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
  4. Everett v. State97 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1957)
  5. Willoughby v. State203 So. 2d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
  6. Lee v. State165 So. 2d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Mathis v. State682 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
  2. Steinhorst v. State412 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1982)
  3. Stephan v. State251 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
  4. State v. Darnell230 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1970)
  5. State v. Darnell217 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
  6. Willoughby v. State203 So. 2d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list