TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Holmes

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Joseph Franklin Holmes, a Minor, by His Guardians and Next Friends, Iva G. Walker and Salvadore Gomes.

Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Holmes, 194 So. 613 (Fla. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1940
Judges
Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Thomas, Terrell, Buford, Compiled, Laws, Rules
Citations
194 So. 613141 Fla. 5951940 Fla. LEXIS 815

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Writ of Error from final judgments of the Circuit Court for Lee County.

In a collision between an automobile driven by Francis Williams and a train of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, Silas Holmes and Mrs. Edna Holmes, passengers in the car driven by Williams, and father and mother of defendant in error were killed. Defendant in error, an 18-months-old child, had both legs broken, and is suing by his guardians and next friends for personal injuries to himself and for the death of both parents.

*596 The circuit court tried all three cases together, and the jury returned verdicts for defendant in error in the sum of $500 for his personal injuries, and $1,000 each for the death of his father and mother.

Railroad Company assigns as errors the failure to direct verdicts in its favor, and' the insufficiency of evidence to support the verdicts.

There was sufficient evidence pertaining to the negligence of the Railroad Company in not giving warning signals at the crossing to go to the jury, and to support the verdicts.

No error appearing, the judgments of the circuit court should be and are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Thomas, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Terrell and Buford not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list