TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lovett v. State

Nap Lovett, Plaintiff in Error, v. the State of Florida, Defendant in Error

Lovett v. State, 116 So. 7 (Fla. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 14, 1928
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Ellis, Strum, Brown
Citations
116 So. 795 Fla. 269

Opinion of the Court — Whitfield

Whitfield, P. J.

On a writ of error to a judgment of conviction of manslaughter it is contended that the evidence shows the accused to be guilty of murder in the first degree or no crime whatever.

Section 6110, Rev. 'Gen. Stats., is as follows: “In all criminal prosecutions hereafter begun in this State, if the defendant be found guilty of an offense lesser in degree, but included in the offense charged in the indictment or information, such verdict shall not be set aside by the court, upon the ground that such verdict is contrary to the evidence, if the evidence produced in such case would have supported a finding, or if such court would have sustained a verdict of guilty of the greater offense.”

The above statute was enacted to change the rule announced in Johnson v. State, 24 Fla. 162 , 4 So. Rep. 535 . Golding v. State, 26 Fla. 530 , 8 So. Rep. 311 . See McCoy v. State, 40 Fla. 494 , 24 So. Rep. 485 .

“In the trial of one under an indictment for murder where the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, a verdict of manslaughter will not be disturbed upon the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to support a verdict of that degree of homicide.” Williams v. State, 73 Fla. 1198 , 75 So. Rep. 785 .

The evidence would have sustained a verdict of a higher offense under the indictment, therefore the conviction for manslaughter is authorized.

Affirmed.

*271 Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 219392026peak 1939 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Holloman v. State191 So. 36 (Fla. 1939)
  2. Davis v. State187 So. 783 (Fla. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Holloman v. State191 So. 36 (Fla. 1939)
  2. Davis v. State187 So. 783 (Fla. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Williams v. State, 75 So. 785 (Fla. 1917) 15
McCoy v. State, 40 Fla. 494 (1898) 43
Johnson v. State, 24 Fla. 162 (1888) 19
Golding v. State, 26 Fla. 530 (1890) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list