Broaddus v. Theurer
J. W. Broaddus, Appellant, v. Paul Theurer, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel.
Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 , 37 South. Rep. 51 ; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389 , 54 South. Rep. 452 ; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197 , 97 South. Rep. 380 , and State ex rel.
Amos, v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55 , 100 South. Rep. 796 ; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91 .
An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.