Lowrie v. Lowrie
E. L. Lowrie, Appellant, v. Daisey Lowrie, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and'argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, con *338 siclerecl, ordered and adjudged by tlie Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Addendum
On Petition for Rehearing.
Per Curiam.
The record in this cause has been carefully re-examined and the questions of law raised in briefs reconsidered. We do not approve the bill of complaint as a model pleading nor do we think the procedure in all respects regular, but on the issues presented by the bill and answer the finding of the Chancellor appears fair and just and is supported by legal evidence. It is therefore affirmed. See Slorah v. Wilcox, 59 Fla. 601 , 52 So., 12 ; Baggott et al. v. Otis et al 65 Fla. 447 , 62 So. 362 ; Craft v. American Agricultural Chemical Co., 81 Fla., 55 , 87 So. 41 .
Decree affirmed on rehearing.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.