TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sattler v. Beachland Development Co.

John G. Sattler, Appellant, vs. Beachland Development Company, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, and Sarah E. Manuel, a Widow, Appellees

Sattler v. Beachland Dev. Co., 136 So. 631 (Fla. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 14, 1931
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Davis
Citations
136 So. 631102 Fla. 916

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Hay vs. Salisbury, 109 So. 617 .

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hay v. Salisbury, 109 So. 617 (Fla. 1926) 68

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list