Bernard v. Wassel and Sevy Wassel, His Wife v
Bernard v. WASSEL and Sevy Wassel, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward M. EGLOWSKY, Stephen H. Stillerman, Appellants, v. Arnold GOLDMAN, and Central Trust Company, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
In an exhaustive opinion, the district judge granted judgment to plaintiffs Bernard V. Wassel and Sevy Wassel against defendants Edward M. Eglowsky and Stephen H. Stillerman, and he gave Eglowsky and Stillerman judgment for contribution against Arnold Goldman, a third-party defendant, exonerating Central Trust Company, another third-party defendant.
Wassel v. Eglowsky, 399 F.Supp. 1330 (D.Md.1975). Plaintiffs’ recovery was grounded upon defendants’ violation of § 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 777 (1) (selling unregistered securities).
Defendants Eglowsky and Stiller-man appeal, assigning numerous grounds for reversal. We find none of them meritorious, and we affirm on the opinion of the district court, adopting it as our own with regard to the violation of § 12(1) of the Act and defendants’ right to contribution from Goldman.
AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 30 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals12
- Federal District Courts14
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Baker, Watts & Company v. Miles & Stockbridge Timothy R
- Austin v. Loftsgaarden
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,926 Heizer Corporation v. Jordon Ross
- Joseph J. LAWLER, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Frank E. Mower, II v. Thomas W. GILLIAM, Jr. and General Erle Cocke, Jr.
- Smith v. Mulvaney
- Muriel B. Seymour and David Seymour v. Summa Vista Cinema, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.