Hines v. State
J. H. Hines v. State
Hines v. State, 195 So. 160 (Fla. 1940)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the record in this case and no reversible error has clearly appeared to us, therefore, the judgment is— Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.