TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Maas Bros. v. Fuller

Maas Brothers, a Corp., v. H. Walter Fuller, Et Al.

Maas Bros. v. Fuller, 163 So. 470 (Fla. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 9, 1935
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, Davis
Citations
163 So. 470121 Fla. 1751935 Fla. LEXIS 1534

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error states that there are two questions presented in this case. From a perusal of the record, we conceive that there is only one question presented and that is, whether or not there was any evidence which would support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This is true because the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.

A careful perusal of the bill of exceptions, which we have considered although its propriety in the record is seriously questioned, shows that there was evidence to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Carter v. Florida Power & Light Co.189 So. 705 (Fla. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Carter v. Florida Power & Light Co.189 So. 705 (Fla. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list