Burns, Et Ux. v. Campbell
Owen Burns, Et Ux. v. Minerva Campbell, a Widow.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The appeal is from an order denying motion to dismiss bill of complaint in a suit filed to foreclose a lien of certain tax certificates.
The only question presented by the appellant is whether or not the description of the land as contained in the bill of complaint is sufficient. That description is' as follows:
“The unplatted portion South and adjoining Lots 2, 4, Block IB, plat of Sarasota, Section 19, Township 36, South, Range 18 East.”
On its face the description is good. Whether or not the complainant will be able to show on trial the existence of any lands that could be located by this description is a matter to be considered when that point is reached.
There was no reversible error in denying motion to dismiss.
Affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that “no action can be taken by [the Supreme Court] unless a majority of the judges present concur therein”)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.