TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Reddick v. State

Dallas Reddick, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error

Reddick v. State, 117 So. 510 (Fla. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 5, 1928
Judges
Buford, Terrell, Whitfield
Citations
117 So. 51096 Fla. 140

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11933: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Dade County Security Co. v. Barns128 So. 860 (Fla. 1930)
  2. State of Florida ex rel. v. Atkinson Lasseter146 So. 581 (Fla. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list