Martin v. Wilson
Kate Havlin Martin, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of John H. Havlin, Deceased, Appellant, v. M. D. Wilson, N. S. Wood and J. H. Ware, Trading and Doing Business as Wilson Sheet Metal Works, Appellees
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the Court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that part of the decrée allowing attorney’s fees, which should be reversed, and the costs of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rother, decided at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.
Reversed in part.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.