United States v. Ivan Melchor Moreno and Rigoberto Melchor Moreno
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan MELCHOR MORENO and Rigoberto Melchor Moreno, Defendants-Appellants
Opinion
ON PETITION AND SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR REHEARING Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and LIVELY * , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In footnote 3 of our opinion we referred to the holding of United States v. Godkins, 527 F.2d 1321 (CA5, 1976), that the government’s privilege against revealing the identity of an informer may be invoked only when the government seeks to avoid disclosure of an informer’s identity, and we noted that when an accused seeks to subpoena an individual “already known to him” the privilege is irrelevant. This reference to “already known” is to be read in the light of Godkins , where the defendant knew the name of the informer. We do not imply that the government’s privilege against revealing identity is irrelevant where all that the defendant knows is that there is an informer (or even an informer that he can describe), and he does not know the name of the informer.
The petition and supplemental petition for rehearing by the United States are OVERRULED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.