TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bronson v. State

Claude Bronson v. State of Florida

Bronson v. State, 10 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 1, 1942
Judges
Brown, Terrell, Chapman, Thomas
Citations
10 So. 2d 718152 Fla. 281942 Fla. LEXIS 681
Cited by 5

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Claude Bronson, with others, was convicted in a trial on. an information charging the breaking and entering of a building with intent to commit grand larceny. From a study of the record we are of the' opinion that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time the appellant broke and entered he entertained an intent to commit grand larceny, but there is ample testimony to establish the breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny; therefore, under the provisions of Section 310, Criminal Procedure Act (Section 924.34, Florida Statute, 1941), the judgment of the trial court is reversed “with directions . . . to enter judgment” for the latter offense.

Reversed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1947: 11957: 11958: 11968: 11969: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jalbert v. State95 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1957)
  2. Channell v. State107 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
  3. McKee v. State33 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1947) · Dissent
  4. Foster v. State220 So. 2d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
  5. Thompson v. State207 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Foster v. State220 So. 2d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
  2. Thompson v. State207 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
  3. Channell v. State107 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
  4. Jalbert v. State95 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1957)
  5. McKee v. State33 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1947) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list