TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Robert Bazan-Molina

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BAZAN-MOLINA, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Bazan-Molina, 544 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 16, 1976
Docket
No. 76-2348
Judges
Brown, Gewin, Morgan, Per Curiam
Citations
544 F.2d 1931976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5807

Opinion — Per Curiam

*194 PER CURIAM:

Robert Bazan-Molina has appealed from his conviction in the Southern District of Texas for possession of ISO pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute. Finding his only contention to be without merit, we affirm.

While driving on United States Highway 281, the appellant was stopped at a permanent border patrol checkpoint located seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. The appellant’s vehicle had all of the windows rolled up. When the appellant opened his door to respond to the border patrolman’s questions concerning his citizenship status, the officer detected the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle. With suspicions aroused, the officer peered through the windows of the vehicle and noticed seeds and leaves resembling marijuana on the floor below the backseat of the car. A subsequent search yielded 130 pounds of marijuana in brick form.

Appellant contends that the stopping of his vehicle and the ensuing search violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment. This conclusion is unwarranted under the decisions of this court. We have consistently held that the border patrol checkpoint near Falfurrias, Texas is a permanent checkpoint. Stopping vehicles at such checkpoints to inquire into citizenship does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, — U.S. —, 96 S.Ct. 3074 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). Searching a vehicle at a permanent checkpoint is valid if, after stopping the vehicle, the border patrolman has probable cause to make the search.

United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 2585 , 45 L.Ed.2d 623 (1975). The officer’s detection of the odor of marijuana coupled with his observation of marijuana debris in the backseat area furnished probable cause for the search.

United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299, 1300 (5th Cir. 1976).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 21978: 31984: 119772026peak 1978 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Roy Lee Blanford566 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1978)
  2. United States v. Jose Arredondo-Hernandez574 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir. 1978)
  3. United States v. Efren Fontecha576 F.2d 601 (5th Cir. 1978)
  4. United States v. Arnoldo Cantu Garza547 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1977)
  5. United States v. John Paul Gorthy550 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1977)
  6. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)
  2. United States v. Efren Fontecha576 F.2d 601 (5th Cir. 1978)
  3. United States v. Jose Arredondo-Hernandez574 F.2d 1312 (5th Cir. 1978)
  4. United States v. Roy Lee Blanford566 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1978)
  5. United States v. John Paul Gorthy550 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1977)
  6. United States v. Arnoldo Cantu Garza547 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (1975) 446
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) 1,657
United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1976) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list