TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brockett v. Forbes

Grace P. Brockett, a Widow, Plaintiff in Error, v. Don Ald Forbes, Defendant in Error

Brockett v. Forbes, 116 So. 793 (Fla. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 4, 1928
Judges
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford
Citations
116 So. 79395 Fla. 859

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs .and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in .the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. McEwen, Et Ux.161 So. 68 (Fla. 1935)

Most recent

  1. Smith v. McEwen, Et Ux.161 So. 68 (Fla. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list