Kessler v. Townsley
Vera Kerr Kessler v. Frank Townsley and May Townsley.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The writ of error brings for review a judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit instituted in the Circuit Court of Volusia County wherein plaintiff sought to recover damages for the alienation of the affections of her husband.
Plaintiff in error contends that there are twenty-six questions of law presented for our determination.
A careful consideration of the record discloses that the evidence was entirely insufficient to have supported a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and, this being true, other matters become of no material consequence.
The judgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.