Conaway v. Scott
Conaway v. Scott.
Opinion of the Court
Reid, Chief Justice.
This being a bill of exceptions to a judgment awarding custody of a minor child on habeas corpus, and no party being named in the bill of exceptions or shown in the record as defendant in error, and the parties in whose favor the custody of the child was awarded neither being made defendants in error nor served with a copy of the bill of exceptions nor waiving service, this court is without jurisdiction. Code § 6-911;
Ray v. Oconee Naval Stores Co., 190 Ga.
402 ( 9 S. E. 2d, 632 );
701 ( 7 S. E. 2d, 264 );
367 ( 188 S. E. 336 );
Moore v. NeSmith Lumber Co., 18
225 ( 89 S. E. 169 ), and cit.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur, except Hewlett, J., not participating.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.