Dooly v. Gates
Dooly, Ordinary, Et Al. v. Gates
Opinion of the Court
Reid, Chief Justice.
In the bill of exceptions error is assigned on the overruling of a demurrer to a petition for mandamus. It does not appear that mandamus absolute has been granted, and no error is assigned on such a judgment. We have several times ruled that a writ of error of this character is premature. Bridges v. Poole, 176 Ga. 500 (168 S.
*484 E. 577);
Board of Education of Miller County v. Sheffield, 177 Ga.
100 ( 169 S. E. 302 );
Ramsey v. Mingledorff, 183 Ga.
701 ( 189 S. E. 521 ). The writ of error is dismissed, with direction, that the plaintiff in error be allowed to file the copy of the bill of exceptions in the superior court, as exceptions pendente lite.
No. 13763.
June 16, 1941.
Rehearing denied Juey 9, 1941.
Jesse M. Sellers, for plaintiffs in error.
W.
B. Robinson, contra.
Writ of error dismissed, with direction.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.