Kyle v. Huiet
Kyle Et Al. v. Huiet, Commissioner of Labor, Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
“A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal bill of exceptions, confers no jurisdiction of the case upon this court, is not amendable to correct the defect, and will be dismissed with or without motion for that purpose.
Speer v. Merryman, 56
529 ;
Brand v. Garrett, 62
165 ;
Wellborn v. Atlanta &c. R. Co., 92
577 ( 17 S. E. 672 );
798 ( 43 S. E. 57 );
O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga.
949 ( 43 S. E. 1001 );
560 ( 94 S. E. 1012 ) ;
237 ( 110 S. E. 217 );
439 ( 117 S. E. 246 ).”
Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga.
856 ( 162 S. E. 134 ). The document in the present record purporting to be a bill of exceptions, and properly certified by the trial judge, is not signed by the plaintiffs in error or their counsel.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.