TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jones v. Butler

JONES v. BUTLER Et Al.

Jones v. Butler, 12 S.E.2d 326 (Ga. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 12, 1940
Docket
No. 13428.
Judges
Bell
Citations
12 S.E.2d 326191 Ga. 1261940 Ga. LEXIS 646

Opinion of the Court — Bell

Bell, Justice.

Whether or not the order of January 26, 1940, should have provided only for the elimination of the four particular paragraphs of the petition unless they were amended, it actually adjudged that the whole petition should stand dismissed in the absence of “appropriate amendment.” This amounted, whether correctly or incorrectly, to an adjudication that these paragraphs were essential to the statement of a cause of action for any relief; and the order was not met or satisfied by an amendment which struck these averments altogether from the petition. The amendment as proposed having failed to comply with the terms of the order, which not being excepted to became the law of the case, the final order of May 24, 1940, formally dismissing the action was not erroneous. See Smith v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 181 Ga.

479 (5) ( 182 S. E. 603 );

Rivers v. Key, 89

Ga.

832 ( 7 S. E. 2d, 732 );

Sutton v. Adams, 180 Ga.

48 (4) ( 178 S. E. 365 ) ;

Beermann v. Economy Laundry Co., 153 Ga.

21 ( 111 S. E. 399 ) ;

Keen v. Nations, 43

Ga. App.

321 ( 158 S. E. 613 );

Gaines v. Merlin, 49

Ga. App.

511 ( 176 S. E. 48 );

Stainback v. Dunn, 53

Ga. App.

464 (3) ( 186 S. E. 220 ). The order of June 23, 1939, overruling the general demurrer and the motion to dissolve the receivership, were necessarily conditional or provisional in the sense that other and different adjudications might later be made on consideration of the special demurrers; and consequently, although these orders were not excepted to, they did not become the law of the case so as to prevent “a fresh adjudication” upon tire petition as a whole, in connection with such judgment as might be later rendered on the special demurrers.

Folsom v. Howell, 94

Ga.

112 ( 21 S. E. 136 );

McConnell v. Frank E. Block Co., 26

Ga. App.

550 ( 106 S. E. 617 );

*129 Smith v. Bugg, 35

Ga. App.

317 ( 133 S. E. 49 );

Georgia Power Co.

v. Richards, 42

Ga. App.

741 ( 157 S. E. 241 ). Accordingly, what has just been said regarding the order of January 26, 1940, should not be different because of anything contained in the orders of June 23, 1939. See Bond v. Harrison, 185 Ga.

260, 264 ( 194 S. E. 549 );

Brown v. Parks, 190 Ga.

540 (7, 8) ( 9 S. E. 2d, 897 ).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1941: 11942: 11946: 11947: 11948: 31949: 21950: 11954: 11965: 11967: 11968: 119412026peak 1948 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Livingston v. Barnett19 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1942)
  2. Hayes v. Simpson62 S.E.2d 441 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  3. Luke v. Ellis40 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. 1946)
  4. Parsons v. Foshee55 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1949)
  5. Anagnostis v. Alexandrou48 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. 1948)
  6. Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Hawkins161 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Hawkins161 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
  2. Randall v. LeGate155 S.E.2d 415 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
  3. Herrin v. Spikes144 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
  4. Worsham v. Palmer83 S.E.2d 185 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
  5. Hayes v. Simpson62 S.E.2d 441 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  6. May v. Atlanta Builders Inc.55 S.E.2d 728 (Ga. Ct. App. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 14

DepthCaseCited by
Folsom v. Howell, 21 S.E. 136 (Ga. 1894) 40
Smith v. Bugg, 133 S.E. 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926) 34
Sutton v. Adams, 178 S.E. 365 (Ga. 1934) 26
Smith v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 182 S.E. 603 (Ga. 1935) 22
McConnell v. Frank E. Block Co., 106 S.E. 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921) 20
Ga. Power Co. v. Richards, 157 S.E. 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931) 10
Stainback v. Dunn, 186 S.E. 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936) 9
Brown v. Parks, 9 S.E.2d 897 (Ga. 1940) 6
Beermann v. Economy Laundry Co., 111 S.E. 399 (Ga. 1922) 5
Keen v. Nations, 158 S.E. 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931) 5
Bond v. Harrison, 194 S.E. 549 (Ga. 1937) 1
Gaines v. Merlin, 176 S.E. 48 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934) 1
Rivers v. Key, 7 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. 1940) 21
Murphy v. Atlanta & West Point R.R., 89 Ga. 832 (1892) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list