TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Victor Publishers, Inc. Appeal of Robert v. Pace

In Re VICTOR PUBLISHERS, INC. Appeal of Robert v. PACE

Victor Publishers, Inc. v. Pace, 545 F.2d 285 (1st Cir. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 29, 1976
Docket
No. 76-1325
Judges
Coffin, Aldrich, McEntee
Citations
545 F.2d 28510 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 8081976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The only issue before us on this appeal is the correctness of the district court’s dismissal for want of prosecution of Robert V. Pace’s appeal from the bankruptcy judge’s denial of his motion to appear on behalf of Victor Publishers, Inc., a debtor in Chapter XI proceedings. The bankruptcy judge denied the motion on the grounds that Mr. Pace is a non-lawyer and as such may not represent a corporation. The district court dismissed Mr. Pace’s appeal, ruling that “he is not entitled to represent the appellant debtor, a corporation.” We affirm.

Although an individual has a statutory right to represent himself in federal court even if he is not a lawyer, 28 U.S.C. § 1654 , a corporation may be represented only by licensed counsel.

See, e. g., Commercial & Railroad Bank v. Slocomb, 14 Pet. 60, 65 , 39 U.S. 60, 65 , 10 L.Ed. 354 (1840);

Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 830 , 22 U.S. 738, 830 , 6 L.Ed. 204 (1824);

United States v. 9.19 Acres of Land, 416 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir. 1969);

Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Continental Record Co., 386 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1967);

Simbraw, Inc. v. United States, 367 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1966);

Flora Construction Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., 307 F.2d 413 , 414 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 950 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963);

James v. Daley & Lewis, 406 F.Supp. 645, 648 (D.Del.1976);

Turner v. American Bar Ass’n, 407 F.Supp. 451, 476-77 (N.D.Tex.1975);

MacNeil v. Hearst Corp., 160 F.Supp. 157, 159 (D.Del.1958).

* This rule that a corporation may be represented only by licensed counsel is based not just on a tradition that goes back to the common law, Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc., 20 F.Supp. 369 (S.D.N.Y.1937), but also on the practical consideration that “[sjince a corporation can appear only through its agents, they must be acceptable to the court; attorneys at law, who have been admitted to practice, are officers of the court and subject to its control.”

Id.

Accordingly, the bankruptcy judge properly denied Mr. Pace’s motion.

Affirmed.

* Mr. Pace cites the case of In re Las Colinas, Inc., 453 F.2d 911 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1067 , 92 S.Ct. 1502 , 31 L.Ed.2d 797 (1972), as an instance where we permitted a non-lawyer to represent a corporation. Special considerations, including the extraordinary legal ability that had been demonstrated by the corporate officer in that case, caused us to make an exception from the traditional rule that “[a] ' corporation . . can appear only by attorney.”

Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 830 , 22 U.S. 738, 830 , 6 L.Ed. 204 (1824) (Marshall, C. J.).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 48 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 11978: 31979: 21980: 31981: 11982: 11983: 41985: 31986: 21987: 11988: 31990: 11991: 11992: 11993: 21994: 21995: 11996: 31998: 22000: 32001: 12004: 22014: 42024: 119772026peak 1983 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Rivera912 F. Supp. 634 (D.P.R. 1996)
  2. In re Las Colinas Development Corporation, Debtor.585 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1978)
  3. Move Organization v. United States Department of Justice555 F. Supp. 684 (E.D. Pa. 1983)
  4. Schreibman v. WALTER E. HELLER & CO., ETC.446 F. Supp. 141 (D.P.R. 1978)
  5. In re WHET, Inc.33 B.R. 438 (D. Mass. 1983)
  6. Schreibman v. Walter E. Heller & Co.585 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Summers v. City of FitchburgNo. 1:23-cv-12849 (D. Mass. Feb. 12, 2024)
  2. I-D Foods v David Deaver Brown2014 DNH 219 (D.N.H. 2014)
  3. In re Feliciano Gonzalez Construction, Inc.No. 14-05790 (Bankr. D.P.R. July 16, 2014)
  4. In re Feliciano Gonzalez Construction, Inc.No. 14-05790 (Bankr. D.P.R. July 16, 2014)
  5. In re Feliciano Gonzalez Construction, Inc.No. 14-04931 (Bankr. D.P.R. June 19, 2014)
  6. Mild, Inc. v. R.I. Department of Environmental Management, 02-6281 (2004)No. 02-6281 (Sup. Ct. R.I. Nov. 10, 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 11

DepthCaseCited by
Osborn v. Bank of United States, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 738 (1824) 1,633
Commercial & R.R. Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, Richards & Co., 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 60 (1840) 72
Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc., 20 F. Supp. 369 (S.D.N.Y. 1937) 40
Turner v. Am. Bar Ass'n, 407 F. Supp. 451 (S.D. Ala. 1975) 140
Simbraw, Inc. v. United States, 367 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1966) 121
United States v. 9.19 Acres of Land, 416 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir. 1969) 102
Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Cont'l Record Co., 386 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1967) 69
MacNeil v. Hearst Corp., 160 F. Supp. 157 (D. Del. 1958) 31
James v. Daley & Lewis, 406 F. Supp. 645 (D. Del. 1976) 28
Miles v. City-Parish Gov't of East Baton Rouge Parish, 405 U.S. 1066 (1972) 22
In re Las Colinas, Inc., Debtors. Appeal of Banco Popular De Puerto Rico. In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., Debtors, 453 F.2d 911 (1st Cir. 1972) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list