United States v. Eliseo Andrade
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eliseo ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s vehicle was stopped for routine determination of citizenship at the permanent Border Patrol checkpoint 7 miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. During that questioning, the Border Patrolman noticed a strong odor of marihuana emanating from the vehicle. A search revealed 225 pounds of marihuana in the trunk.
This Court has previously held the checkpoint seven miles south of Falfurrias to be a permanent one.
United States v. McCrary, 5 Cir. 1976, 543 F.2d 554 ;
United States v. Garza, 5 Cir. 1976, 539 F.2d 381, 382 ;
United States v. Cantu, 5 Cir. 1974, 504 F.2d 387, 389 . Stopping vehicles at a permanent Border Patrol checkpoint to inquire into the occupants’ citizenship does not offend the Fourth Amendment or require á judicial warrant.
Sifuentes v. United States, aff’d sub nom.
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3074 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). A search at a permanent checkpoint is valid, if, after stopping the vehicle, the Border Patrolman finds probable cause for the search.
United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 , 95 S.Ct. 2585 , 45 L.Ed.2d 623 (1975);
United States v. Santibanez, 5 Cir. 1975, 517 F.2d 922 . The odor of marihuana emanating from appellant’s vehicle gave the officer probable cause to detain appellant and search his car.
United States v. McCrary, supra; United States v. Kidd, 5 Cir. 1976, 540 F.2d 210 ;
United States v. Garza, supra; United States v. Torres, 5 Cir. 1976, 537 F.2d 1299 .
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Kenneth L. Yarbrough for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for appellant is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5 Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521 and United States v. Crawford, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Gary Woody, United States of America v. Blanchard L. Savant
- United States v. Catarino Capatillo Gutierrez
- United States v. Jesus Ybarra Villarreal and Abundio Hernandez Martinez
- United States v. Ronald Dale Dunn and Robert Lyle Carpenter
- United States v. Efren Fontecha
- United States v. Dennis Mark Kohler
Most recent
- United States v. Dennis Mark Kohler
- United States v. Ronald Dale Dunn and Robert Lyle Carpenter
- United States v. Efren Fontecha
- United States v. Ralph Bert Holbrook
- United States v. Gary Woody, United States of America v. Blanchard L. Savant
- United States v. Jesus Ybarra Villarreal and Abundio Hernandez Martinez
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.