Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan Corporation
Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan Corporation.
Opinion of the Court
Felton, J.
1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial not having the approval of the trial judge, present no question for determination by this court.
2. It was not error to direct a verdict for possession of the premises in dispute in favor of the plaintiff in the dispossessory warrant, the verdict so directed being demanded by the evidence.
3. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, it will be presumed that the amount of monthly rent found by the jury to be due for the premises, was the double rent contemplated by the law, and that this issue was presented to them under a proper charge of the court.
Judgment affirmed.
Sutton, P. J., and Parker, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.