Roper v. State
Roper v. the State
Opinion of the Court
Broyles, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of possessing whisky which did not bear the tax stamps required by law. The evidence disclosed that the officers went to a tobacco farm which was in the defendant’s possession as tenant. They found the defendant sitting in his automobile. In the back of his car was an empty keg with a sheet spread over it. The keg had the smell of whisky in it. About seventy-five yards from the defendant’s residence, near a tobacco house, the officers found in the weeds a quart bottle about half full of unstamped whisky. There were tracks leading from defendant’s residence to the tobacco house, the tobacco house being in the defendant’s possession. The tobacco house was in an open field, and the officers testified that any one passing by> could have put the whisky in the weeds. The State introduced documentary evidence showing that the defendant had previously been convicted of similar offenses.
Held, that the evidence was wholly circumstantial, and, while raising a strong suspicion against the accused, was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The court erred in denying a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.