TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Detweiler Mercantile Co. v. Babcock

DETWEILER MERCANTILE COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. the Honorable WILLIAM A. BABCOCK, Judge of the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, in and for Twin Falls County, Et Al., Defendants

Detweiler Mercantile Co. v. Babcock, 260 P. 162 (Idaho 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Idaho Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1927
Docket
No. 5122.
Judges
Givens, Lee, Taylor, Budge
Citations
260 P. 16244 Idaho 7771927 Ida. LEXIS 163

Opinion of the Court — Givens

GIVENS, J.

Petitioner sought a writ of mandate to require the Honorable William A. Babcock, one of the judges of the district court of the eleventh judicial district, Twin Falls county, to set aside and annul a judgment and decree entered by him dissolving a temporary injunction and dismissing the action in which the temporary injunction had been issued. The injunction was sought for the purpose *778 of restraining the defendants as a school board from accepting a bid, and paying for a certain quantity of coal, from the Filer Elevator Company, on the ground that their action in so doing was discriminatory and contrary to law because petitioner had presented a lower bid.

It appears from the record that after .the temporary injunction was dissolved the coal was purchased and paid for. The substance of the controversy has therefore disappeared, since the only relief sought was injunctive, and only a moot question remains to be determined, and nothing this court could do or direct the trial court to do would afford any relief to petitioner and this court will not consider such a ease.

(Porter v. Speno, 13 Ida. 600 , 92 Pac. 367 ;

Abels v. Turner Trust Co., 31 Ida. 777 , 176 Pac. 884 ;

Adamson v. Moyes, 32 Ida. 469 , 184 Pac. 849 ; 1 C. J. 973.) This conclusion renders it unnecessary to consider or pass upon the questions of practice and procedure raised by petitioner.

The writ is denied and costs'are awarded to defendants.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Taylor and T. Bailey Lee, JJ., concur.

Budge, J., took no part in the opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11933: 11954: 11955: 11958: 11972: 11994: 11998: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. Bonner County School District No. 82887 P.2d 35 (Idaho 1994)
  2. Nelson v. Marshall497 P.2d 47 (Idaho 1972)
  3. State Tax Commission v. Johnson269 P.2d 1080 (Idaho 1954)
  4. Dorman v. Young332 P.2d 480 (Idaho 1958)
  5. Fischer v. Board of Trustees965 P.2d 1292 (Idaho 1998)
  6. Kiefer v. City of Idaho Falls265 P. 701 (Idaho 1928)

Most recent

  1. Fischer v. Board of Trustees965 P.2d 1292 (Idaho 1998)
  2. Johnson v. Bonner County School District No. 82887 P.2d 35 (Idaho 1994)
  3. Nelson v. Marshall497 P.2d 47 (Idaho 1972)
  4. Dorman v. Young332 P.2d 480 (Idaho 1958)
  5. Doolittle v. Morley278 P.2d 996 (Idaho 1955)
  6. State Tax Commission v. Johnson269 P.2d 1080 (Idaho 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Abels v. Turner Trust Co., 176 P. 884 (Idaho 1918) 15
Adamson v. Moyes, 184 P. 849 (Idaho 1919) 6
Porter v. Speno, 92 P. 367 (Idaho 1907) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list