TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Steve Alan Duncan

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve Alan DUNCAN, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Duncan, 547 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 25, 1977
Docket
No. 76-3574
Judges
Ainsworth, Morgan, Gee
Citations
547 F.2d 9031977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14561

Opinion — Per Curiam

.PER CURIAM:

Steve Alan Duncan appeals from his conviction by a United States District Judge sitting without jury for possession of 388 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We affirm the conviction.

Duncan was stopped by border patrol agents at a permanent checkpoint seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. When *904 Duncan opened his car window several inches to answer an agent’s questions, the agent detected the odor of marijuana. After informing Duncan of his rights the agent asked Duncan to open the trunk of his car; the marijuana was inside the trunk.

On appeal Duncan argues that to allow odor alone to provide probable cause “is to leave all motorists at the mercy of an officer’s whimsical olfactory sense.” This argument is without merit. Detection of the distinctive odor of marijuana is sufficient to establish probable cause, United States v. Diaz, 5 Cir., 1976, 541 F.2d 1165, 1166 .

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 21984: 119772026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. John Paul Gorthy550 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1977)
  2. United States v. Ruben Ubin Garza554 F.2d 257 (5th Cir. 1977)
  3. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Oyarzun582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tex. 1984)
  2. United States v. Ruben Ubin Garza554 F.2d 257 (5th Cir. 1977)
  3. United States v. John Paul Gorthy550 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Diaz, 541 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1976) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list