TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. First of Englewood Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. Jarecki

The People Ex Rel. First of Englewood Bond and Mortgage Corporation, Petitioner, vs. Edmund K. Jarecki, Judge, Respondent

People ex rel. First of Englewood Bond & Mortg. Corp. v. Jarecki, 192 N.E. 419 (Ill. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1934
Docket
No. 22399. Writ awarded.
Judges
Farthing, Stone, Orr, Herrick
Citations
192 N.E. 419357 Ill. 4751934 Ill. LEXIS 761

Opinion of the Court — Farthing

Mr. Justice Farthing delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an original petition for mandamus filed by leave of this court. The prayer of the petition is that the writ issue and that the respondent, as judge of the county court of Cook county, be directed to expunge void orders entered by him in that court in the case of McDonough vs. First of Englewood Bond and Mortgage Corp. (No. 73400) in the county court of Cook county.

Mandamus will lie to expunge an order-entered by a court without jurisdiction. There is no force in the contention of the respondent that only a moot question remains since the receiver was discharged, without objection, by the order entered in the county court of Cook county on January 25, 1934. By the same order certain allowances were made to the receiver out of rents collected by him from petitioner’s real estate.

The question of the jurisdiction of a county court to appoint the county treasurer, who is ex-officio county collector, as receiver under “An act for the assessment of property and for the levy and collection of taxes,” approved March 30, 1872, as amended, (which amendment was approved on April 28, 1933, and is known as the Slcarda act,) was decided by us in McDonough v. Gage, (ante, p. 466.) What was there said is controlling here. For the reasons there stated the respondent was without jurisdiction to enter the orders appointing the receiver, and was also without jurisdiction to enter the orders approving his report or to make allowance of costs and charges out of the rents collected by him from the real estate of petitioner.

The prayer of the petition is therefore granted and the writ is awarded. The constitutional question raised need not be" considered.

writ awarded.

Stone, Orr and Herrick, JJ., dissenting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11945: 11961: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. Richardson266 N.W. 867 (Minn. 1936)
  2. Herb v. Pitcairn64 N.E.2d 519 (Ill. 1945)
  3. People ex rel. Town Court of Cicero v. Harrington171 N.E.2d 647 (Ill. 1961)

Most recent

  1. People ex rel. Town Court of Cicero v. Harrington171 N.E.2d 647 (Ill. 1961)
  2. Herb v. Pitcairn64 N.E.2d 519 (Ill. 1945)
  3. Johnson v. Richardson266 N.W. 867 (Minn. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list