TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The People v. Wheeler

The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. LeRoy Wheeler, Plaintiff in Error

People v. Wheeler, 64 N.E.2d 865 (Ill. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Illinois Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 23, 1946
Docket
No. 29155. Judgment affirmed.
Judges
Smith
Citations
64 N.E.2d 865392 Ill. 4551946 Ill. LEXIS 257

Opinion of the Court — Smith

Mr. Justice Smith delivered the opinion of the court: .

On October 12, 1939, plaintiff in error entered a plea of guilty in the circuit court of Adams county to an indictment charging him with the crime of forgery. He was sentenced to the penitentiary at Chester, there to be detained until discharged according to law. He has brought the common-law record here for review on writ of error.

He contends first that the judgment is invalid for the reason that there is no provision of law under which persons may be sentenced to the “penitentiary at Chester.” His 'second contention is that the judgment is invalid for the reason that it is vague and uncertain and does not set out the specific duration of the term of confinement. His final contention is that he was transferred to the penitentiary at Stateville without a hearing in court, as provided by section 3 of the Parole Act of 1917. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 38, par. 803.

All of these contentions have been definitely decided adversely to the contentions of plaintiff in error. (People ex rel. Ross v. Becker, 382 Ill. 404 .) Section 3 of the Parole Act of 1917, providing for a hearing'in court for a transfer from one institution to another, applies only to those originally sentenced to the reformatory and not to those sentenced in the first instance to the penitentiary. There is no error in the record.

The judgment of the circuit court of Adams county is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1982: 219822026peak 1982 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shango v. Jurich681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)
  2. Shango v. Jurich681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)

Most recent

  1. Shango v. Jurich681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)
  2. Shango v. Jurich681 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. Ross v. Becker, 47 N.E.2d 475 (Ill. 1943) 41

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list