Egger v. Huff
Opinion of the Court
FLANAGAN, J.
Appellant’s brief presents no question for review for the following reasons:
1. Under the heading “Errors relied upon for reversal,” no errors are set forth except such as would be grounds for a new trial, but there is nothing in the brief to inform the court whether there was a motion for a new trial or whether appellant is attempting to assign these errors independently.
2. There is no attempt to set forth a “concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and exception relied upon,” as required by Rule 2-17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court.
3. None of appellant’s propositions or points are supported by authority as required by the above rule.
Judgment affirmed.
NOTE. — Reported in 81 N. E. 2d 378 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.