TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Security Finance Company v. Collins

Security Finance Company v. Collins.

Sec. Fin. Co. v. Collins, 5 S.W.2d 886 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 17, 1928
Judges
Logan
Citations
5 S.W.2d 886224 Ky. 1341928 Ky. LEXIS 539

Opinion of the Court — Logan

Opinion of the Court by Judge Logan Reversing.

On the 15th day of October, 1924, the appellee, Collins, executed and delivered to the Brenard Manufacturing Company six promissory notes aggregating $215. Before any of the notes were due, the Brenard Manufacturing Company, for a valuable consideration, transferred and assigned the notes to Security Finance Company, the appellant. Collins refused to pay the notes. Thereupon appellant instituted suit against him. He answered, denying that the notes had been assigned and transferred to the appellant for a valuable consideration, and further pleading that his signature to the notes was obtained through the fraud of the agent of the Brenard Manufacturing Company.

Appellant established that it purchased the notes from the Brenard Manufacturing Company for a valuable consideration. There is no evidence to the contrary. The evidence of appellee tended to establish that his signature was obtained by fraud. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee under the instructions given by the court. The instructions given by the court did not submit the issues which might have been made under the pleadings. However, in view of the fact that the court should have instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of appellant for the full amount sued for, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the instructions. The only theory that occurs to us which guided the court in giving his instructions must have been that the notes were not assigned or transferred to appellant as required by law, since they were indorsed by the Brenard Manufacturing Company by a stamp on the back thereof as follows:

“Pay Security Finance Co., or order, Brenard Manufacturing Co., per L. J. Records.”

*136 This indorsement was sufficient. Selma Savings Bank v. Webster County Bank, 182 Ky. 604 , 206 S. W. 870 , 2 A. L. R. 1136.

A plea of fraud in the procurement of a negotiable note cannot prevail against a holder in due course of value without notice. Security Finance Co. v. Thompson, 216 Ky. 364 , 287 S. W. 938 .

In his answer, appellee relied upon sections 4215-4223, Ky. Stats., relating to notes known as “peddlers’ notes” as a defense. The order for the radio, which was the thing for which the notes were executed, was taken by a salesman in Kentucky and transmitted to the Brenard Manufacturing Company in the state of Iowa for approval and shipment. It was therefore an interstate transaction, and the statute aforesaid does not apply. Citizens’ Bank v. Crittenden Record-Press, 150 Ky. 631 , 150 S. W. 814 ; Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. Jones, 207 Ky. 566 , 269 S. W. 722 .

The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1930: 11933: 12006: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Worden v. Kennedy56 S.W.2d 329 (Ky. Ct. App. 1933)
  2. Melton Electric Co. v. Central Credit Corp.28 S.W.2d 507 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)
  3. Melvin Ketchum v. StateNo. 13-05-00622-CR (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi Aug. 10, 2006)

Most recent

  1. Melvin Ketchum v. StateNo. 13-05-00622-CR (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi Aug. 10, 2006)
  2. Worden v. Kennedy56 S.W.2d 329 (Ky. Ct. App. 1933)
  3. Melton Electric Co. v. Central Credit Corp.28 S.W.2d 507 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Brenard Mfg. Co. v. Jones, 269 S.W. 722 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925) 13
Selma Sav. Bank v. Webster Cnty. Bank, 206 S.W. 870 (Ky. Ct. App. 1918) 8
Sec. Fin. Co. v. Thompson, 287 S.W. 938 (Ky. Ct. App. 1926) 5
Royal Neighbors of Am. v. Hayes, 150 S.W. 845 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912) 4
Citizens Bank v. Crittenden Record-Press, 150 S.W. 814 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list