Curvin J. Trone, Jr., Trustee for Westgate California Corporation v. C. Arnholt Smith
Curvin J. TRONE, Jr., Trustee for Westgate California Corporation, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. C. Arnholt SMITH Et Al., Defendants-Petitioners
Opinion
Despite the implications in Cord v. Smith, 338 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1964), we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) is not the proper avenue by which to obtain review of the district court’s denial of a motion to disqualify an attorney for conflict of interest.
See Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 496 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1974) (in banc).
See also Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 534 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1976);
Draganescu v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 502 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1974). We therefore deny permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b). The accompanying motion for a stay of further proceedings is denied without prejudice.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(§ 1292(b) is not a proper avenue for review of denials of disqualification)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.