TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James A. Moreau v. Richard A. Tonry

James A. MOREAU Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Richard A. TONRY Et Al., Defendants-Appellants

Moreau v. Tonry, 554 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 9, 1977
Docket
No. 76-4230
Judges
Goldberg, Hill, Kerr, Per Curiam
Citations
554 F.2d 1631977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13003

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellee James A. Moreau, unsuccessful primary candidate for the 1976 Democratic nomination for the office of United States *164 Representative from the First Congressional District of Louisiana, brought this civil rights action on behalf of himself and a class, alleging widespread fraud in that primary. Chiefly, appellees sought to nullify that primary and to enjoin the November 1976 general election for that office or to set aside the general election if it took place, pending a new primary.

The district court granted a temporary restraining order blocking the general election. The court simultaneously denied motions to dismiss and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b), certified the order of denial for interlocutory appeal to allow this court to address the underlying questions. This court stayed the district court’s restraining order and granted interlocutory appeal.

Appellant Richard A. Tonry, who was certified by the Louisiana Secretary of State as the victor in the disputed Democratic primary, won the general election in November. Tonry took his seat in the House of Representatives.

On May 4, 1977, Richard Tonry resigned from his office as United States Representative, 123 Cong.Rec. H3982 (daily ed. May 4, 1977). This action rendered moot appellee’s chief requests to set aside the Democratic primary and the subsequent general election that had placed Tonry in Congress. Those requests formed the overwhelming bulk of the lawsuit before us. Whatever might be said to remain after those requests are removed, nothing survives of this action for which this court would grant interlocutory appeal.

Accordingly, the order of the district court is vacated and remanded for consideration of the mootness of the entire action or for such further proceedings as may be required. This court expressly relinquishes jurisdiction.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 11985: 11991: 12001: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Donald J. Johnson v. Patrick H. Burken930 F.2d 1202 (7th Cir. 1991)
  2. United States v. Bear Marine Services, and International Matex Tank Terminals, Inc.696 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1983)
  3. Parcel Tankers, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corporation764 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  4. ACLU v. BridgesNo. 01-30016 (5th Cir. Sept. 11, 2001)

Most recent

  1. ACLU v. BridgesNo. 01-30016 (5th Cir. Sept. 11, 2001)
  2. Donald J. Johnson v. Patrick H. Burken930 F.2d 1202 (7th Cir. 1991)
  3. Parcel Tankers, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corporation764 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  4. United States v. Bear Marine Services, and International Matex Tank Terminals, Inc.696 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list