Anderson Nat. Bank v. Reeves
Anderson Nat. Bank v. Reeves.
Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. Anderson Nat'l Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233 (1944). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by Chief Justice Fulton Affirming.
This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the first appeal, reported in 293 Ky. 735 , 170 S. W. (2d) 350 , upheld the validity of the principal sections of Chap. 79 of the Acts of 1940 as amended by Chap. 156 of the Acts of 1942 (KRS 393.010 et seq.) and affirmed the judgment of the lower court on the appeal but re versed it on the cross-appeal.
On the return of the case to the lower court judgment was entered in conformity with the opinion. This appeal is from that judgment.
We are bound by the opinion on the first appeal, whether it be right or wrong, under our familiar law of the case rule. We have considered the contentions 1) the Act in question conflicts with the National Banking Act and 2) that it is violative of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and find the contentions without merit.
Since the judgment is in conformity with the former opinion it is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.