Carter H. Ogden, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden v. United States of America, E
Carter H. OGDEN, Zelma Ogden and Dorothy Ogden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee; E. B. OGDEN, Jr. and Nancy A. Ogden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the taxpayers’ actions for refund of income taxes alleged to be due by virtue of deductions claimed for certain losses resulting from expropriation of their property by the Cuban government. See Ogden et al. v. United States, S.D.Miss. 1977, 432 F.Supp. 214 .
1
Perusal of the record and the briefs of the parties, followed by oral argument, persuades us that the trial court correctly determined that the claims for refund were time-barred under Section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 165 .
AFFIRMED.
1
. The district court’s opinion and order of dismissal are also reported at 37 A.F.T.R.2d 409 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.