TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Gabriel Francis Antelope

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gabriel Francis ANTELOPE, Appellant

United States v. Antelope, 555 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 20, 1977
Docket
No. 74-2741
Judges
Kilkenny, Choy, Goodwin
Citations
555 F.2d 13781977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12870

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The facts leading up to the appellant’s trial and conviction are stated in our opinion, United States v. Antelope, 523 F.2d 400 (CA9 1975). That decision was reversed by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Antelope,-U.S.-, 97 S.Ct. 1395 , 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977), and the cause remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.

Inasmuch as the Supreme Court rejected appellant’s sole contention, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641 (1977) 250
United States v. Gabriel Francis Antelope, United States of Am. v. Leonard Francis Davison & William Andrew Davison, 523 F.2d 400 (9th Cir. 1975) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list