TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Loudy v. Elcomb Coal Co.

Loudy v. Elcomb Coal Co., 183 S.W.2d 953 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 1, 1944
Judges
Stanley
Citations
183 S.W.2d 953298 Ky. 7321944 Ky. LEXIS 983

Opinion of the Court — Stanley

Opinion op the Court by Stanley, Commissioner Affirming.

The petition of the appellant, Calvin Loudy, against *733 the appellee, Elcomb Coal Company, was dismissed upon his failure to make it more certain and specific under order of the court or to amend after a general demurrer was sustained to it.

The petition merely alleged that the plaintiff was a coal loader in the defendant’s mines from May 15, 1940, to April 3, 1942; that he worked every day the mines ran between those two dates; that the defendant “gave him short weights on his tonnage of coal mined during said time by the plaintiff to the amount of 331 tons of coal at 65 cents per ton amounting to $215.15; that at another time the plaintiff mined 416 tons at 76 cents per ton amounting to $316.16 and 2061 tons at 3 cents per ton amounting to $6189. He says that the amount above set out is wholly unpaid, just and past due and owing him by the defendant and the defendant owes him $32.29 for-over charge, on electricity, clothes, bath house and the defendant owes him $138.00 over charge on rents amounting in all to $724.50 which is just and past due.”

In his brief the appellant merely says that the demurrer should have been overruled and that he could not make his petition more specific. The petition does not state a cause of action. It does not allege any relationship of employer and employe nor are the terms of any contract of employment or any facts given. The plaintiff merely states a conclusion that the defendant owed him the sums stated. No proper defense could have been prepared to such an indefinite and fatally deficient charge. We are of opinion, therefore, that the court properly dismissed the petition upon the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the order of the court. Reid v. Lyttle, 150 Ky. 304 , 150 S. W. 357 ; Barnett v. Latonia Jockey Club, 249 Ky. 285 , 60 S. W. 2d 622 .

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Perry v. Perkins245 P.2d 405 (Idaho 1952)

Most recent

  1. Perry v. Perkins245 P.2d 405 (Idaho 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Barnett v. Latonia Jockey Club, 60 S.W.2d 622 (Ky. Ct. App. 1933) 8
Reid v. Lyttle, 150 S.W. 357 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list