TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Florida Tile Company, Subsidiary of Sikes Corporation

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA TILE COMPANY, Subsidiary of Sikes Corporation, Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fla. Tile Co., Subsidiary of Sikes Corp., 557 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 14, 1977
Docket
No. 76-1313
Judges
Edwards, Lively, En-Gel
Citations
557 F.2d 57695 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 30091977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12459

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order reported at 221 N.L.R.B. No. 70 (Nov. 7, 1975). The Board had found the company violated § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(3) and (1) (1970), by discharging an employee, Lois Moore, because of her activities in behalf of a union.

On review of the briefs and records and oral arguments in this case, we note 1) that Moore’s discharge occurred five days after she had contacted employees to meet with her cousin, who was a representative of the Union involved, 1

2) that the discharge was one day after her supervisor, Carmickle, learned of her union activities, and 3) that after telling her she was discharged, Carmickle, while he was walking her out of the *577 plant, said, “I don’t think this was a very smart thing for you all to do, passing these out on my shift,” referring to union authorization cards.

While there is considerable evidence that employee Moore might not have been a wholly satisfactory employee, this total record, including the facts recited above, contains substantial evidence from which the Board could properly have found, as it did, that her discharge was motivated by an anti-union animus and hence was discriminatory, in violation of § 8(a)(3).

The order of the National Labor Relations Board will be enforced.

1

. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 119882026peak 1988 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board863 F.2d 946 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board863 F.2d 946 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list