TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Flowers v. Grand Lodge, K. P.

Flowers v. Grand Lodge, K. P. [Fn]

Flowers v. Grand Lodge, K. P., 146 So. 782 (La. Ct. App. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 27, 1933
Docket
No. 14480.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
146 So. 7821933 La. App. LEXIS 1573

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff claims as beneficiary of a deceased member of defendant, Grand Lodge, Knight's of Pythias, State of Louisiana, Jurisdiction of North America, South America, .Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia (Colored). She seeks to recover the face amount of a policy issued to 'deceased in which she was named as beneficiary, and she also asks for such burial benefit as is provided therein. The amount claimed, is not disputed, nor is it denied that plaintiff is entitled to the benefits provided in the policy, but payment is resisted on the ground that “under the law of defendant institution, as amended on April 20, 1931, payments are to be made by the Grand Chancellor ninety (90) days or more after date of filing claim, or such time as there may be sufficient funds in the En-. dowment Department to pay - the claims in the order in which they are filed in the office of1 the Grand Chancellor.” No evidence was submitted by defendant in an attempt to establish the defense that there are not on hand sufficient funds in the endowment department to pay the claim. The failure to offer such evidence, if, in fact, any is available, resulted from the mistaken idea that the burden was upon plaintiff to prove that such funds are available.

We believe,' however, since the policy contains an absolute obligation to pay in accordance with the by-laws and since the by-laws provide, in effect, that payment will be made unless no funds are available, that the burden of showing absence of funds is upon defendant because this is a special defense. Since defendant has not sustained this burden, it follows that the judgment appealed from is correct.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list