TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frank Grocery Co. v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

FRANK GROCERY CO., Inc., v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY

Frank Grocery Co. v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 145 So. 372 (La. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 31, 1932
Docket
No. 31321.
Judges
Odom
Citations
145 So. 372176 La. 1801932 La. LEXIS 1958

Opinion of the Court — Odom

*181 ODOM, J.

This suit involves a controversy similar to that in Schuster’s Wholesale Produce Co. v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co., 176 La. 167 , 145 So. 368 , this day decided. The facts are identical, ■and there was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the ease No. 31320, the judgment herein appealed from is reversed, and it is ordered that plaintiff’s demands be rejected and its suit dismissed, at its costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.45 F. Supp. 871 (W.D. La. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.45 F. Supp. 871 (W.D. La. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Schuster's Wholesale Produce Co. v. Tex. & P. Ry. Co., 145 So. 368 (La. 1932) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list