TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., Inc.

MARTIN v. TOYE BROS. YELLOW CAB CO., Inc., Et Al.

Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., 164 So. 175 (La. Ct. App. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 18, 1935
Docket
No. 16099.
Judges
McCall
Citations
164 So. 175

Opinion of the Court — McCALL

McCALL, Judge ad hoc.

Following the granting of a rehearing, we have painstakingly reviewed the entire record herein and -have carefully considered the arguments made in brief and at the bar; and the result is that we are the more convinced of the correctness of our original conclusions.

We consider that the facts proven by the weight of the testimony and the probabilities are accurately set forth in our previous opinion.

The only substantial issue of law is in regard to the sufficiency of the original answer as containing a plea of contributory negligence and the propriety of allowing the amended answer definitely and clearly pleading contributory negligence. We deem any further consideration of these issues unnecessary, because in the view of the facts adopted by us the plaintiff was necessarily not guilty of negligence proximately causing or contributing to the accident.

For the reasons assigned, our previous decree is reinstated and is the final decree of this court.

Original decree reinstated.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list