Udell Lambert Davidson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Udell Lambert DAVIDSON, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Opinion
Petitioner appeals from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals which affirmed the decision of the immigration judge denying petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1).
1
Under the terms of section 1254(a)(1), the Attorney General may, in his discretion, suspend deportation and adjust the status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence where the alien can prove (1) that he has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than seven years prior to his application, (2) that he is a person of good moral character, and (3) that deportation would, in the opinion of the Attorney General, result in extreme hardship to the alien, or his spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. Only the existence of “extreme hardship” is an issue in the present case.
Petitioner claims that deportation would impose extreme hardship on him and his citizen children because they would be deported to Belize, British Honduras, a city and country with a lower standard of living than the United States. Petitioner also contends that deportation of him and his wife would constitute de facto deportation of his citizen children and that such deportation of these children is impermissible under the Fourteenth Amendment.
This court’s review is limited to the question of whether the Board has *1363 abused its discretion.
Hun Chak Sun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 415 F.2d 791, 792 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 908 , 90 S.Ct. 905 , 25 L.Ed.2d 89 (1970). We have previously held that economic disadvantage alone does not constitute extreme hardship.
Kasravi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 400 F.2d 675, 676 (9th Cir. 1968). We have also held that an alien illegally present in the United States cannot gain a favored status merely by the birth of his citizen child.
Lee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 550 F.2d 554, 555-56 (9th Cir. 1977).
The order of the Board is therefore AFFIRMED.
1
. 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1) provides:
“(a) As hereinafter prescribed in this section, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, suspend deportation and adjust the status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, in the case of an alien who applies to the Attorney General for suspension of deportation and— “(1) is deportable under any law of the United States except the provisions specified in paragraph (2) of this subsection; has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than seven years immediately preceding the date of such application, and proves that during all of such period he was and is a person of good moral character; and is a person whose deportation would, in the opinion of the Attorney General, result in extreme hardship to the alien or to his spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence; .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“We have previously held that economic disadvantage alone does not constitute extreme hardship.”)
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Rafeal Ramirez-Durazo, Rosa Isela Lopez De Ramirez, Luz Maria Ramirez-Alcaraz, Maria Sara Ramirez-Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Erodina Urbano De Malaluan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- United States v. Plechner
- Eleonore Rotraut Banks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Michele Chiaramonte v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most recent
- Gonzalez-Reynozo v. Bondi
- Singh v. Holder
- PILCH
- IGE
- Rafeal Ramirez-Durazo, Rosa Isela Lopez De Ramirez, Luz Maria Ramirez-Alcaraz, Maria Sara Ramirez-Alcaraz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Patricio Hernandez-Cordero and Maria Guadalupe Ortega De Hernandez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.